Powering
the Planet.
Star Law, or Entanglement Relativity (SL), is the framework behind FUSA’s route from stellar energy to industrial power.
Our ambition: to become the world’s largest power generator. Our programme begins with national participation and expands into industry, wider energy access and the space economy.
Explore the science and the programmeStar Law.
From first principles
to the cosmos.
A conserved ledger. A different way to understand what the universe can do.
Star Law, also called Entanglement Relativity, connects one closure framework to cosmic and particle scales. Its predictions follow from stated closure inputs and can be checked against named observational benchmarks.
A first-principles closure expression, evaluated before comparison with cosmological observations:
The released closure inputs are f⋆ ≈ 0.2936651703, ΔI⋆ ≈ 142.340472752 and qlink = ln 2. Here ℓP is the Planck length.
These relations apply to the saturated de Sitter horizon account; ξ is its radius. The horizon capacity links the cosmic scale to the same closure ledger.
Nact counts active screen links; VH is the regulated static-patch volume. The resulting density defines the active length used in the particle-scale calculations.
Where does the 0.293665 share fit?
It is the initial protected-sector share, f⋆, with a complementary screen share of approximately 0.7063348297.
The later charge-visibility refinement supplies the matter fractions below. These are successive stages of the calculation, with distinct meanings.
| Quantity | Star Law | Benchmark | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total matter | 0.31598424 | 0.315 | 0.312% |
| Baryonic matter | 0.04928177 | 0.04930923 | 0.056% |
| Cold dark matter | 0.26670246 | 0.26415659 | 0.964% |
| Cosmological constant | 1.0901036 | 1.0909105 | 0.074% |
The cosmological-constant row is in 10−52 m−2. Matter entries are late-time density fractions; the corresponding dark-energy balance is approximately 68.40%, neglecting radiation.
The public results also include selected Yukawa reasoning and a reported proton-scale comparison of about 2.61 parts per million. Each result retains its own formula, assumptions and comparator. Read the Planck comparison source.
How the framework came about.
The journey began with an aerospace question: how do you give a vehicle the power it needs without making the energy system consume the vehicle? Propulsion, plasma control and the cost of maintaining order led into a deeper investigation of quantum information, complexity and geometry. Star Law emerged from that work in 2021.
A causal diamond is a region bounded by what can follow an earlier event and what can reach a later one. Where two diamonds overlap, their observers describe part of the same physical world. Star Law asks what must hold for those local views to form one consistent account.
BOSC—balanced-overlap spectrum consistency—requires neighbouring descriptions to agree on their shared region. UOCE—unified overlap-closure extremum—extends that agreement around closed routes through the overlaps: returning to the same region must preserve the same physical content.
The “no hidden spectator” rule completes the logic. An extra, invisible subsystem cannot be inserted to make an otherwise incomplete account work. The observable overlaps must account for the physically relevant interior.
From this closure, Star Law defines a conserved entanglement-based ledger. Its distribution and local accessibility can change as the universe expands; dilution does not mean disappearance.
Here Nk(t) counts admitted closure units at scale k, each carrying ln 2 of dimensionless charge. The conservation law applies to the complete admitted system under closed evolution; local entanglement can change.
The protocol.
Tested on IBM
quantum hardware.
A measured response, repeated and challenged with controls.
Alice supplied Solar LOCC record. The record played an integrated role in the conditional protocol. Alice’s measured branch selected the operation at Dave, where the campaign scored the resulting work response.
in both Campaign 4C executions
IBM Kingston jobs
Each job comprised 330,000 circuit executions across its prescribed settings. The programme tested the intended response against altered addresses and reversed branch signs. Both Campaign 4C runs retained their raw results separately.
| Operation | Primary | Repeat |
|---|---|---|
| Normal conditional operation | +2.0289 | +1.7302 |
| Controller disabled | +0.0934 | −0.0878 |
| Conditional sign reversed | −6.4797 | −6.3810 |
The normal operation produced positive work; disabling the controller brought the result close to zero; reversing the conditional sign drove it negative. This is an accessible view of why the controls matter.
What exactly was measured?
The QPU experiments measured the implemented protocol’s finite-model work, entanglement and response structure. Reported capped pre-transducer power equivalents use the campaign’s declared normalization; they are not electrical power delivered by the IBM chip.
Stellar energy.
Local work.
Observation, a shared quantum resource, and a conditional operation at the receiver.
Alice observes the source-linked quantum state. Bob supplies the public buffer and coordination role. Dave performs the conditional work-extraction operation and the local conversion toward usable electrical output.
- Alice
- Quantum-state observation based on neutrino and HFGW interaction.
- Bob
- Buffering and coordination of the record used by the protocol.
- Dave
- Maxwell-mode-projected, 3+1D ER/EPR-assisted QET quantum work-extraction module.
Why ER/EPR matters.
ER is Einstein–Rosen: a geometric bridge. EPR is Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen: a question about quantum correlations between separated systems. Maldacena and Susskind later proposed a deep connection between these two descriptions.
Star Law asks a sharper question within its own framework: if two overlapping regions require a joint quantum closure, can their geometry still describe them as entirely independent? Its headline result connects a non-product closure—one that cannot be separated into independent parts—to a corresponding bridge class.
Within Star Law’s finite-index, recoverable, causal class, with no hidden spectator:
The value is a way to connect quantum correlations with an interaction geometry. Boundary and bulk descriptions offer complementary ways to study the same relation. For Dave, that connection informs where an admissible interaction can occur; Alice’s classical record selects the local operation. The bridge relation itself grants neither faster-than-light signalling nor energy from topology alone.
Background: Maldacena & Susskind on ER=EPR.
Superactivation adds a related insight: resources without a particular capability individually can acquire it through joint use. Star Law investigates what its shared closure makes accessible; the IBM campaign provides the protocol’s experimental evidence.
What does wireless mean here?
It describes the source-to-terminal route. The terminal still connects to the user’s electrical installation, with the required protection, cooling, service and qualification. Behind-the-meter deployment can reduce dependence on distant generation and transmission additions.
The technology is exclusive to FUSA and is the subject of international patent filings with an established priority date.
From national access
to industrial power.
Member nations first. Energy-intensive industry next. Wider access follows.
FUSA is rolling out Solar Core Extraction in phases. National participation establishes the route for strategic allowances and industrial access. Smaller commercial and domestic service follows as production expands and regional qualifications are completed.
Target daily delivery capability. Equivalent to 41.67 GW of average output at that rate.
Target daily energy delivery. Equivalent to 1.667 TW of average output.
The industrial roadmap covers installations from 1–100 MW, with scaling toward 1 GW systems. Later commercial and domestic access extends across the proposed 1–100 kW range. Modular engineering allows installation size to grow with the duty.
Deployment proceeds where legislation allows and once the relevant terminals receive appropriate electrical homologation. Joining the programme, receiving an allowance and commissioning electrical service are successive milestones.
The objective is to shorten the route to usable power from years to months in suitable deployments. Beyond these stages lies a longer ambition of up to 40 TW of continuous capacity by the decade’s end, alongside the expansion into space applications.
Explore national participationDiscuss an industrial requirement
The value begins
when the power arrives.
A factory that opens sooner. A data centre that can run. A country with more room to grow.
The electricity tariff captures only part of the economic story. A project waiting for power has capital committed, people waiting and production deferred. The missing output affects suppliers, employment, trade and public revenue. The value of earlier operation can reach far beyond the price of a kilowatt-hour.
“At the foundation is energy.”
Huang places energy beneath chips, infrastructure, models and applications. It is a useful view of the physical foundation supporting the AI economy. FUSA’s proposition addresses that foundation: dependable power where productive activity needs it.
A low household tariff can also conceal an expensive national energy system. Imported fuel, infrastructure finance and utility subsidies still have to be paid for. Reducing the total burden can free money for healthcare, education, investment, lower selected taxes or less borrowing—even before the saving appears on a customer’s bill.
Cheaper power can create a larger market.
Current consumption reflects what people can afford and what infrastructure makes possible. Change the price, reliability and time to access, and more activities become economic: water production, recycling, computing, industrial processing and eventually operations beyond Earth.
Computer memory offers a useful analogy. Moving from 64 to 128 kilobytes would have been an inadequate description of the future digital economy. Greater capability enabled new uses. Energy access can change the demand story in the same way.
The IEA itself describes its energy outlooks as scenarios. Their assumptions make them useful planning tools; they do not establish a ceiling for a changed technology and cost structure. IEA scenario explanation.
How does this connect to GDP and development?
Dependable power supports production and the value added by an economy. Purchasing power parity adjusts comparisons for price levels; it is distinct from the output lost through unreliable energy. FUSA’s economic thesis includes both unlocking productive activity and reducing the resources committed to supplying power. The detailed explanation also covers the MIT and Joule energy-economics studies, fiscal burdens and country-specific evidence.
A new market
in access to power.
The valuable service moves toward dependable access, allocation and operation.
FUSA’s membership model draws on Formula 1: participants enter a shared enterprise with defined rights, contributions and an agreed distribution of benefits. National allowances, entry contributions and non-dilution arrangements give each element of participation a distinct commercial role.
A global benchmark for energy access can make the underlying service easier to compare. Local taxes, terminal integration and service remain visible parts of the actual offer. The question expands from “What does electricity cost?” to “What can this access make possible?”
Utilities have a choice in that transition. Their operational expertise, customer relationships and local service could support a new role as informational QET node managers. They could organise entitlements, continuity, metering and settlement. Businesses whose earnings depend on customers having no alternative route to power face a different competitive future.
Energy access as an asset.
Contracted capacity and QET bandwidth could support forward commitments, hedging and markets in access rights. The proven-reserves analogy asks whether dependable, economically recoverable access can support financing in a comparable way. These possibilities depend on the rights, delivery obligations and instruments being established.
How can participation be financed?
Financing can be structured around defined access rights, delivery commitments and associated cash flows. Instrument design and any rating process belong to the specific transaction. Institutional discussions develop those terms.
Powering
the space economy.
Toward a Type-II civilisation: a wider horizon for what humanity can build.
A spacecraft, mine or settlement needs more than a destination. It needs power to communicate, process materials, maintain life support and do useful work. Producing water, oxygen, fuel and components where they are needed can change what must be launched from Earth—and what becomes viable beyond it.
FUSA’s wider programme connects energy access to orbital industry, resource processing and habitats. The frontier research extends to advanced propulsion, including Alcubierre-type concepts, nuclear printing, boundary chemistry and climate restoration.
These applications have different development paths. Their common ambition is to expand the energy and material capabilities available to civilisation. Type-II language expresses that strategic direction; individual deployment milestones mark progress within it.
Can the full research be reviewed?
The public material provides substantial scientific logic, headline formulas, experimental results and further reading. The full Star Law text is available for serious scientific review through verified written requests and the NDA process. Detailed ER/EPR construction and proprietary implementation remain within controlled review.
Understand the evidence.
Explore the opportunity.
Research, institutional and industrial enquiries begin through FUSA’s outreach process. The public explanation provides the headline results and scientific background; deeper review follows through the appropriate verified request and NDA arrangements.